자작문제 풀어보시고, 평가해주시면 감사하겠습니다:) (2)

■ 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳을 고르시오.

In the case, it even rarely requires much sophisticated empirical study to recognize that telling people that they should trust science because they have no choice is unlikely to be a productive means of controlling such orientation.

   The force of the injunction to trust some authority turns in part on one’s take on the ‘workability’ of not trusting that authority. More recently, even the question of whether simple face masks are safe to wear and effective at reducing the spread of diseases like COVID-19 have been controversial. ( ① ) In this light, one might be tempted to reject their analogy; there is an alternative to trusting science: not trusting science. ( ② ) In recent years, a science communications strategy has emerged with both conceptual–normative and empirical support: to communicate about socially-controversial scientific issues framed as matters of scientific consensus. ( ③ ) Unfortunately, we believe that there’s reason for caution about the consensus-framing as a general strategy for science communication. ( ④ ) While it may be possible to articulate a compelling normative justification for this strategy, such a justification requires that the messaging takes a form that appears unlikely to be generally effective. ( ⑤ ) This is because scientific consensus, as a concept, seems not to be broadly understood. 

* injunction n. 명령  ** articulate v. 정교화하다

--------------------------------------

안녕하세요! 오르비 여러분들! 최근 <N제 / 자체 모의고사> 작업 중에 있습니다. 다만, 난이도 조절에 관해서 더 넓은 의견이 필요해서, 오르비에 올려봅니다. 풀어보시고 답 혹은 평가를 해주시면 대단히 감사드리겠습니다!