상변선생 [342667] · MS 2010 · 쪽지

2013-09-01 10:34:24
조회수 4,565

수능완성 변형문제 (지칭역시 변형됩니다)

게시글 주소: https://ys.orbi.kr/0003814596

지칭대상 찾기는 변형이 안된다는 생각을 가진 수험생과 선생님들이 가끔 보입니다. 

하지만 지칭대상 찾기 문제에 쓰인 지문도 지문 나름입니다. 충분히 변형될 수 있습니다. 
제가 이미 어떤 교재에 사용한 지문은 스포할 수 없어서 안쓴 문제를 하나 가져와 봤습니다. 
이 문제를 보시고 특정 유형은 변형될 수 없다는 고정관념에서 벗어나시고, 모든 문제를 최소한 한 번 이상 다루시길 바랍니다. (도표도 변형이 되긴 합니다. 하지만 이건 지문 내용을 다시 쓰는 것이라 어차피 시험장에서 읽어보셔야 할겁니다. 그래도 문제를 푸는 것이 도표내용을 이해하는데 도움은 됩니다.)


이 문제는 수능완성 유형편 21페이지의 문제입니다. 

21p 다음 글의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은?






 When we give and give until we're exhausted, usually it's because we feel that this is the only way others will accept us or maintain a relationship with us. If we stop giving, they will stop loving us. We believe that they will accept us for what we can give them, rather than for who we are. We believe this because we have so little real trust in our own value - in our own selves. On the deepest level, we fear we're lacking in things that are essential to being a good person. Without our grandiose gestures of self-sacrifice, they will see through us to our lack of them. We aren't giving other people what they need, so much as what we think will shield them from seeing whatever it is in us that we think we lack. So we center our lives around them and keep making sacrifices for them.






① our desire to be with other people



② a way to raise our own value by giving



③ something you need to hide from others



④ things that each person need to be good



⑤ the reason people make sacrifice for others 




덤으로 몇 문제 더 씁니다. 오래 전에 만들어 놓았던 문제들입니다. ^^ 수능완성 변형교재는 올해 만들 시간이 없을 것 같아서 9월중순 이후부터 매일 매일 만드는대로 올려 드리고 나중에 모아서 다시 올려 드리겠습니다. 





실전편


53p 다음 글의 요지로 가장 적절한 것은?


 Two archaeologists, Steven Kuhn and Mary Stiner, think that modern, African-origin Homo Sapiens had sexual division of labor and Neanderthals did not, and that this was the former’s crucial ecological advantage over the latter when they came head-to-head in Eurasia 40,000 years ago. They point out that there is just no sign of the kind of food normally brought by gatherer women in Neanderthal debris, nor of the elaborate clothing and shelters that Inuit women make while their men are hunting. There are occasional shellfish, tortoises, eggshells and the like — foods easily picked up while hunting — but not grindstones and no sign of nuts and roots. This is not to deny that Neanderthals cooperated and cooked. But it is to challenge the notion that the sexes had different foraging strategies and swapped the results. Either the Neanderthal women sat around doing nothing, or, since they were as masculine as most modern men, they went out hunting with the men.


① 호모사피엔스는 네안데르탈인보다 영리했다.

② 네안데르탈인은 협력도 했었고 요리도 했었다.

③ 네안데르탈인에게는 성별에 따른 분업이 없었다.

④ 네안데르탈인 여성은 사냥하지 않을 때는 놀았다.

⑤ 남아있는 흔적을 통해 고인류의 삶을 추론할 수 있다.




76p 다음 글의 요지로 가장 적절한 것은?


 To get the most out of a meeting, you must limit the risks and focus the group to achieve your purpose. Each person brings his or her basic needs, competitiveness, aspirations, agenda, personality, and feelings as well as talents and abilities to the meeting. Moreover, with each person added to the meeting, the number of relationships among members increases geometrically. When three people meet, the dynamics are A vs. B, A vs. C, and B vs. C, or three sets of relationships. But four people meeting creates six sets of relationships among the participants. A ten-person meeting actually creates forty-five different relationships. As a meeting grows in size, productivity decreases dramatically. Each additional person increases the risk of failure.


① Two heads are better than one.

② There is no smoke without fire. 

③ Everyone has his own standard.

④ Too many cooks spoil the broth.

⑤ Having nothing, nothing can he lose.













































































0 XDK (+0)

  1. 유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.